There are many choices for Internet marketers to consider when getting Linux hosting. From the cheapest shared hosting plans to dedicated servers, there are a lot of hosting providers for website owners to consider. Even cloud based hosting services are becoming widely available as well. With so many providers, it can be hard to determine which company to go with. One of the more important quality signals for search engine companies is the page load speed. Regardless of the web hosting product being purchased, it is important to make sure that the hosting provider can load web pages fast.
If the search engine companies find that a page takes a long time to load, the website's ranking could fall significantly. That will lead to lost profits. That is why it is important to use providers that have the technology which can make pages load faster. For example, it is a good idea to choose hosting providers that offer caching plugins and other technology as part of a standard software installation. That will make it much easier for customers to build websites that will load quickly. Today, we will compared 2 big Linux Hosting companies. We compared their speed, price, and features to give you better consideration in choosing Best Linux hosting provider.
If the search engine companies find that a page takes a long time to load, the website's ranking could fall significantly. That will lead to lost profits. That is why it is important to use providers that have the technology which can make pages load faster. For example, it is a good idea to choose hosting providers that offer caching plugins and other technology as part of a standard software installation. That will make it much easier for customers to build websites that will load quickly. Today, we will compared 2 big Linux Hosting companies. We compared their speed, price, and features to give you better consideration in choosing Best Linux hosting provider.
Speed Comparison Between ASPHostPortal and LiquidWeb
This image above is taken from ultratools.com site. It is independent site that can measures hosting speed from a hosting provider. Based on this data, we can see that ASPHostPortal is faster than LiquidWeb.
ASPHostPortal tooks 3 ms average time to connect their name server, 67 ms average time to connect TLD Server, and 48 ms average time to connect root server. Otherwise LiquidWeb tooks 22 ms average time to connect their name server, 71 ms average time to connect TLD Server, and 49 ms average time to connect root server.
Price Comparison Between ASPHostPortal and LiquidWeb
ASPHostPortal has 4 plans named host intro, host one, host two, and host three. Their plan starts from $1/mo - $14/mo. All plans included with the latest linux applications. They also offer uptime and 30 days money back guarantee to guarantee customer satisfaction.
Otherwise LiquidWeb also has 4 plans named standard, webmaster, professional, and semi-dedicated. Their plan starts from $14.95/mo - $40/mo. All plans included with the latest linux applications. But, they didn't offer uptime and 30 days money back guarantee to guarantee customer satisfaction.
Features Comparison Between ASPHostPortal and LiquidWeb
We have compared their hosting features, and we have collected main important features from their website. You can check below tabel to compare their hosting features.
Hosting Features
|
ASPHostPortal
|
LiquidWeb
|
---|---|---|
Processor |
Dual Quad-core
|
Unknown
|
RAM |
16 GB
|
Unknown
|
Disk Storage |
15 GB
|
5 GB
|
Bandwidth |
50 GB
|
240 GB
|
Hosted Site |
Unlimited sites
|
1 Sites
|
Email Space |
200 MB
|
Unknown
|
MySQL db |
3 db
|
Unknown
|
One click Installer |
Yes
|
Yes
|
Control Panel |
CPanel
|
Website Panel
|
Price |
$4.5/month
|
$14.95/mo
|
ASPHostPortal Vs LiquidWeb | Summary
From this explanation, we can conclude by ourself which ASP.NET provider that give better services and meet with your requirements. We don’t want to judge you must choose one provider, we just give you consideration to avoid you select wrong provider. The decision back to you.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.